Small typo 0.5/0.95 I think should be 0.05/0.95. I hadn't seen (or at least don't remember) the log odds Bayes' rule and misunderstood it the first time. There is unexpected tempo/complexity jump going from the "trivial" Bayes' rule which is written out in detail, to the more complex log odds version without any exposition.
In the same vein is the simplification of w_0^* supposed to be trivial?
I'm going to stick with the 'Losers average Lovers." sell and move on
Great, thanks for writing this.
Small typo 0.5/0.95 I think should be 0.05/0.95. I hadn't seen (or at least don't remember) the log odds Bayes' rule and misunderstood it the first time. There is unexpected tempo/complexity jump going from the "trivial" Bayes' rule which is written out in detail, to the more complex log odds version without any exposition.
In the same vein is the simplification of w_0^* supposed to be trivial?
Cromwell’s Rule is too funny. I can’t believe I haven’t heard of it before. Bravo!